10 comments

• Sid Mallickwhich nrf?
• Jaya GoswamiBecause going after Al Qaeda promotes NRA's interests, so does giving guns to everybody. This is corporate greed at its best.
• Saurabh JSiddharth corrected... NRA. Jaya are military weapons suppliers also part of NRA? But obviously, I guess. I never thought of this angle. Yes, either way they win!
• Sid Mallickah the NRA.... well the constitution wasn't written with al qaeda in mind... the patriot act was written to fight it...but however....if these numb skulls hadn't gone after the twin towers they could have been operated as a well regulated militia... "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
• Vikram SaxenaHe meant NRA. A genuine question with an answer rooted in the history of the USA: the firm belief that an armed population is the best equipped to preserve freedom; it breaks the monopoly of the state in using violence as a tool of state-policy.
• Sid Mallickwhich nrf?
• Jaya GoswamiBecause going after Al Qaeda promotes NRA's interests, so does giving guns to everybody. This is corporate greed at its best.
• Saurabh JSiddharth corrected... NRA. Jaya are military weapons suppliers also part of NRA? But obviously, I guess. I never thought of this angle. Yes, either way they win!
• Sid Mallickah the NRA.... well the constitution wasn't written with al qaeda in mind... the patriot act was written to fight it...but however....if these numb skulls hadn't gone after the twin towers they could have been operated as a well regulated militia..."A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
• Vikram SaxenaVerified account He meant NRA. A genuine question with an answer rooted in the history of the USA: the firm belief that an armed population is the best equipped to preserve freedom; it breaks the monopoly of the state in using violence as a tool of state-policy.